0.09/0.14	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_14851 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.09/0.14	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.11/0.36	% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
0.11/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.36	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.36	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.36	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.11/0.36	% WCLimit    : 180
0.11/0.36	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:49:34 EDT 2023
0.11/0.36	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.50	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JtIvpDPDSr/Vampire---4.8_14851
0.17/0.51	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.17/0.53	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.17/0.53	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
0.17/0.53	# Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.53	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.53	# post_as_ho5 with pid 15030 completed with status 8
0.17/0.53	# sh2lt with pid 15031 completed with status 0
0.17/0.53	# Result found by sh2lt
0.17/0.53	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.17/0.53	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
0.17/0.53	# Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.53	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.17/0.53	# Search class: HHHSS-FFSF11-SHHFFSBN
0.17/0.53	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.53	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 98s (1) cores
0.17/0.53	# ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 15036 completed with status 0
0.17/0.53	# Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda
0.17/0.53	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.17/0.53	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
0.17/0.53	# Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.53	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.17/0.53	# Search class: HHHSS-FFSF11-SHHFFSBN
0.17/0.53	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.53	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 98s (1) cores
0.17/0.53	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.53	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.53	
0.17/0.53	# Proof found!
0.17/0.53	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.53	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.53	thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: $i > $o).
0.17/0.53	thf(decl_23, type, esk1_1: (($i > $i) > $o) > $i > $i).
0.17/0.53	thf(decl_24, type, esk2_1: (($i > $i) > $o) > $i > $i).
0.17/0.53	thf(decl_25, type, esk3_1: (($i > $i) > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.53	thf(decl_26, type, esk4_1: (($i > $i) > $o) > $i > $i).
0.17/0.53	thf(decl_27, type, esk5_0: $i > $i).
0.17/0.53	thf(cTHM112A_pme, conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $o]:((![X3:$i > $i, X4:$i > $i]:((((X2 @ X3)&(X2 @ X4))=>(![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ (X3 @ X5))<=(X1 @ X5)))&(X2 @ (^[X6:$i]:(X3 @ (X4 @ X6)))))))&(X2 @ (^[X6:$i]:(X6)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JtIvpDPDSr/Vampire---4.8_14851', cTHM112A_pme)).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:$i > $o]:(?[X2:($i > $i) > $o]:((![X3:$i > $i, X4:$i > $i]:((((X2 @ X3)&(X2 @ X4))=>(![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ X5)=>(X1 @ (X3 @ X5))))&(X2 @ (^[Z0/* 17 */:$i]:(X3 @ (X4 @ Z0)))))))&(X2 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:$i]:(Z0))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM112A_pme])])])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X13:($i > $i) > $o]:(((((X13 @ (esk1_1 @ X13))|~(X13 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:$i]:(Z0))))&((X13 @ (esk2_1 @ X13))|~(X13 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:$i]:(Z0)))))&(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X13))|~(X13 @ (^[Z0/* 23 */:$i]:(esk1_1 @ X13 @ (esk2_1 @ X13 @ Z0))))|~(X13 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:$i]:(Z0))))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X13 @ (esk3_1 @ X13)))|~(X13 @ (^[Z0/* 23 */:$i]:(esk1_1 @ X13 @ (esk2_1 @ X13 @ Z0))))|~(X13 @ (^[Z0/* 0 */:$i]:(Z0))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X18:$i]:(((esk5_0 @ X18)=(X18))), introduced(definition)).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X17:$i, X2:($i > $i) > $o]:(((esk4_1 @ X2 @ X17)=(esk1_1 @ X2 @ (esk2_1 @ X2 @ X17)))), introduced(definition)).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk1_1 @ X2))|~((((X2 @ esk5_0))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))))|~((((X2 @ (esk4_1 @ X2)))=(($true))))|~((((X2 @ esk5_0))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk1_1 @ X2))|~((X2 @ esk5_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X25:$i]:(((esk5_0 @ X25)=(X25))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|~((((X2 @ (esk4_1 @ X2)))=(($true))))|~((((X2 @ esk5_0))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))|~((((X2 @ esk5_0))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_3])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))))|~((X2 @ (esk4_1 @ X2)))|~((X2 @ esk5_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((Z0)=(esk5_0)))))=(esk5_0)), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_7])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X5:$i]:(((esk5_0 @ X5)=(X5))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|~((X2 @ (esk4_1 @ X2)))|~((X2 @ esk5_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X2:($i > $i) > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk2_1 @ X2))|~((X2 @ esk5_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X31:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X32:($i > $i) > $i > $i]:((((X31 @ (esk4_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0))))))!=(X32 @ (esk4_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0)))))))|((X31 @ esk5_0)!=(X32 @ esk5_0))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0)))) @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0)))))))))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_11])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i]:(((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((Z0)=(esk5_0)))) @ X5)=(X5))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]), c_0_13])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X31:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X32:($i > $i) > $i > $i]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0))))))|((X31 @ (esk4_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0))))))!=(X32 @ (esk4_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0)))))))|((X31 @ esk5_0)!=(X32 @ esk5_0)))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_14])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X23:$i, X24:($i > $i) > $o]:(((esk4_1 @ X24 @ X23)=(esk1_1 @ X24 @ (esk2_1 @ X24 @ X23)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((Z0)=(esk5_0)))))=(esk5_0)), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_15])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X31:($i > $i) > $i > $i, X32:($i > $i) > $i > $i]:((((X31 @ (esk4_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0))))))!=(X32 @ (esk4_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0)))))))|((^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((X31 @ Z0)=(X32 @ Z0))))!=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((Z0)=(esk5_0)))))|((X31 @ esk5_0)!=(X32 @ esk5_0)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])]), c_0_18])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X2:($i > $i) > $o, X5:$i]:(((esk4_1 @ X2 @ X5)=(esk1_1 @ X2 @ (esk2_1 @ X2 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i]:(((esk2_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((Z0)=(esk5_0)))) @ X5)=(X5))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]), c_0_13])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_24, plain, ((esk4_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((Z0)=(esk5_0)))))!=(esk5_0)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X5:$i]:(((esk4_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i > $i]:(((Z0)=(esk5_0)))) @ X5)=(X5))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_17])).
0.17/0.53	thf(c_0_26, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]), c_0_25]), c_0_13])]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.53	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.53	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.17/0.53	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.17/0.53	# Initial clauses                      : 6
0.17/0.53	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.17/0.53	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
0.17/0.53	# Processed clauses                    : 86
0.17/0.53	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.17/0.53	# ...subsumed                          : 7
0.17/0.53	# ...remaining for further processing  : 78
0.17/0.53	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8
0.17/0.53	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.53	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.17/0.53	# Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.17/0.53	# Generated clauses                    : 129
0.17/0.53	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 105
0.17/0.53	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.53	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
0.17/0.53	# Paramodulations                      : 17
0.17/0.53	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.53	# NegExts                              : 24
0.17/0.53	# Equation resolutions                 : 14
0.17/0.53	# Total rewrite steps                  : 16
0.17/0.53	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.53	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.53	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.53	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.53	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.53	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.53	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.53	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.53	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.53	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.53	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.53	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.53	# Current number of processed clauses  : 57
0.17/0.53	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
0.17/0.53	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.53	#    Negative unit clauses             : 6
0.17/0.53	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 42
0.17/0.53	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31
0.17/0.53	# ...number of literals in the above   : 109
0.17/0.53	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.53	# Current number of archived clauses   : 21
0.17/0.53	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 220
0.17/0.53	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 128
0.17/0.53	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9
0.17/0.53	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
0.17/0.53	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.53	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
0.17/0.53	# BW rewrite match successes           : 2
0.17/0.53	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.17/0.53	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.53	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 27249
0.17/0.53	
0.17/0.53	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.53	# User time                : 0.018 s
0.17/0.53	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.17/0.53	# Total time               : 0.020 s
0.17/0.53	# Maximum resident set size: 1956 pages
0.17/0.53	
0.17/0.53	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.53	# User time                : 0.035 s
0.17/0.53	# System time              : 0.020 s
0.17/0.53	# Total time               : 0.055 s
0.17/0.53	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.17/0.53	% E---3.1 exiting
0.17/0.53	EOF